In her bitter breakup song, "Superhero," Ani Difranco laments, "Art may imitate life, but life imitates tv." Nowhere is that as apparent as the Eurovison song contest, especially this year.
Earlier today, the Spanish EBU affiliate (jokingly?) told Pastora Soler not to win Eurovision because the country can't afford to host the competition. Soler herself made similar comments, saying it wouldn't be in the best interests of Spain or the Spanish people for her to win.
Now, I'm going to lay my bias out on the table here and say that I think Spain's entry is one of the better ones this year, and I would love to see a neck and neck race between her and Nina Zilli (Italy). But what does any of this have to do with tv?
In the episode "A Song for Europe," from British comedy "Father Ted," the main characters catch Eurosong fever, and decide to enter the fictional Eurovision-esque competition. They write a terrible song called "My Lovely Horse" and enter it into the Irish selection competition.
So what happens? They win and head to Eurosong? Why...because Ireland had won for five years running and simply couldn't afford to host it again, so the competition was rigged to send the worst song imaginable. The plan worked, as the episode ends with everyone giving our heroes nul points.
The saddest part? "My Lovely Horse" is better than some of the actual songs that have been up on stage over the years...
While I love Eurovision (and perhaps I would even consider myself a Eurovision geek), that's not the only thing I love. I love good young adult fiction and dystopian stories. Hence, my love for Suzanne Collins' amazing trilogy, The Hunger Games.
Recently, Jezebel.com ran several articles discussing race as it relates to The Hunger Games. The most shocking, in my opinion, was an article about angry racist tweets. Without spoiling the books, the tweets questioned why black actors were cast as certain characters (the characters are described by the author as being black) and one even said that she was no longer saddened by a character's death when she found out the character was actually black.
With this in the back of my head, I should not have been shocked by the racist comments directed against 2012 Ukrainian competitor Gaitana.
Gaitana, one of the pioneers of R&B music in Eastern Europe, is of Congolese and Ukrainian descent. She was born in Kiev, but spent the next four years in the Republic of the Congo before returning to Ukraine with her mother. She sings in three languages and knows two more, and writes and composes all of her own songs. She plays the saxophone. The Kyiv Post called her unpretentious and discussed how she likes to cook and wants to have children.
However, as as Armenia and Azerbaijan have already shown us, an international singing competition is the best place for complex demographic and political issues to be addressed. As the Kyiv Post reported, Yuriy Syrotyuk, a senior member of the Svoboda party (an extremist right wing party that, among other things, seeks to include nationality on Ukrainian passports and ban adoption of Ukranian children by non-Ukrainians), criticized Gaitana's selection, stating “Gaitana is not an organic representative of the Ukrainian culture” and that, since Gaitaiana is biracial, Ukraine will be “associated with a different continent.” He further stated, "As we want to be accepted to the European Union, it could be our opportunity to show the Europeans that we are also a European nation. We need to show our originality."
Let's take a look at that statement again. Gaitana does not deserve to represent Ukraine because she's not white enough. Despite being born in Kiev, having lived most of her life in Kiev, and being a pioneer of Ukrainian music, in the eyes of some, the simple fact that she is biracial somehow makes her not a true representative of Ukrainian culture (never mind that there a hell of a lot of originality in the song itself).
Does she need a birth certificate? Would that make you happy?
Syrotyuk later tried to backtrack, claiming he was merely criticizing the Ukrainian selection process, and did not make any comment about Gaitana's race or skin color. Really? REALLY?! The concern that was Gaitana, a biracial woman, would make people associate Ukraine with Africa. If that's not a comment about skin color, I don't know what is. And, to be sure, I'm certain that the true representatives of Ukrainian culture are white performers such as Verka Serduchka and Svetlana Loboda who sing in English. Ukraine: Come for the glitter, stay for the drag queens.
Now I wish I could write this whole thing off as someone who really truly misspoke (at best) or a racist with a microphone (at worst). After all, in 2012, a biracial singer couldn't really cause that much of a stir outside of Tea Party-esque circles. Boy, was I wrong. These are all comments copied directly from the official "Be My Guest" youtube video:
I didn't write this to imply that Ukrainians are any more racist than anyone else, or than race relations are more problematic in Ukraine than here in the United States or elsewhere in world. Rather, it's to show that no matter how far we think we've come, there's still a long way to go. What shocks me isn't that there are people who have these thoughts, and we can't police thoughts. But rather, what shocks me is how blunt they are in saying it.
Claiming Gaitana is somehow unfit to represent Ukraine because of her race says the wrong thing not just about Ukraine, but about humanity. Whether you love or hate the song, she has worked hard to be able to get up onto that stage, and the color of her skin should have no bearing on whether or not she's "Ukrainian enough" (whatever that means).
Maybe in the end, we should just take what Gaitana herself says to heart. It's not about politics or demographics or xenophobia. It's simply life. “Of course I am Ukrainian! I live here, I work here, I sing here, I fall in love here.”
Eurovision was developed by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) in the 1950s as a way to help unite the war-ravaged countries of Europe. Surely, with such spunky diplopop, the countries would find a way to put aside their difference and unite in music. Right?
Wrong.
Armenia's late departure from the 2012 Eurovision content, to be held in May in Baku, Azerbaijan, illustrates the very real political and social issues lurking just below the surface of disco and glitter. Although originally slated to appear, Armenia withdrew from the competition on March 7, 2012, claiming that Azerbaijan had been unable to guarantee the safety of the Armenian delegation.
So what brought Armenia and Azerbaijan to this point. The answer, like most questions in politics, comes down to land.
Armenia and Azerbajan are located between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea in the Caucasus Mountains region.
The territory in question is a region known as the Nagorno-Karabakh, a self-governing region internationally recognized as being within the borders of Azerbaijan. However, while recognized as being within Azerbaijan, the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh is de facto independent from Azerbaijan.
A close of the disputed territory
While territorial disputes between what is now Armenia and Azerbaijan have long historic roots, including before, during and after World War I, the modern conflict can be traced back to the growing influence of the Soviet Union in the Caucasus region. When both Azerbaijan and Armenia came under Bolshevik control, Stalin originally planned to allocate the Nagorno-Karabakh region to the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic, along with the Nakhchivan region (the part of Azerbaijan on the far left side of the map) as well as the territory between the two. However, hoping to placate Turkey, Stalin changed the borders, allocating both Nakhchivan and Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan and, in many ways, wedging Armenia between the two. The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast was formed in the Azerbaijan SSR, with its borders drawn so as to include as many Armenian villages as possible while excluding majority Azeri territories, and separated from the Armenian SSR by a strip of Azerbaijani territory.
Hence, Nagorno-Karabakh is predominantly ethnic Armenian in a country that is predominantly ethnic Azeri. By the time the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989, Nahorno-Karabakh as 76% ethnic Armenian. The Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh (as noted earlier, the region is self-governmening and all but independent from Azerbaijan) self reports that it is currently 95% Armenian. Increasing the difficulty, the ethnic Armenians are predominantly Christian, while the ethnic Azeri are predominately Muslim.
Firm Soviet control contained the conflict, but with the crumbling of the USSR in the late 1980s, tension between the two nation-states began to rise. Ethnic Armenians alleged that the Azerbaijan SSR attempted to settle the region with ethnic Azeris. In 2002, Haydar Aliyev, a former Soviet official, admitted to attempted Azerification of the region, claiming, "We opened the institute and began sending Azeris from nearby districts there rather than to Baku. We also opened a big shoe factory. Stepanakert [the capitol of Nagorno-Karabakh] had no sufficient labor force, so we began sending there Azeris from places around the region. By doing this I tried to increase the number of Azeris and to reduce the number of Armenians."
In 1988, the Armenian majority began to revolt against Azeribaijan rule, and the local government voted to merge the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast into the Armenian SSR. Armed conflict between Armenians and Azeris ensued, with the Soviet Union granting the Azerbaijan SSR more leeway in controlling the territory. In 1991, Azerbaijan abolished the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast, bringing the territory under direct control of the Azerbaijani government. In November, the ethnic Armenians responded by voting to form an independent state, and by December, full-scale war began between Azerbaijan and the Armenian-supported former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast. By 1994, Armenia controlled 14% of Azerbaijan, and for the first time, Azerbaijan regonized Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent actor in the war. On May 12, 1994, a ceasefire was declared and peace talks began. By this time, fatalities and refugees numbered in the thousands, with claims against the Armenians for engaging in ethnic cleansing against the Azeri. Despite calls from the UN, Armenia has still not withdrawn from Azerbaijan.
Although peace talks continue, lead by the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group, isolated skirmishes continue between Azerbaijani and Armenian forces, including an attack by an Armenian sniper against Azerbaijani forces, resulting in one death, and an Azerbaijani drone being shot down in Nagorno-Karabakh airspace in 2011. And the territory remains one of the most heavily land mined areas in the former Soviet Union, and there are still around half a million refugees and displaced persons. Yet even after 20 years, leaders remain hopefully that a lasting peace can be achieved. Armenia and the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh retain close ties, although Armenia has resisted internal pressure to formally unite Armenia with Nagorno-Karabakh. The close ties, however, can be evidence in the fact that the former President of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (1994-1997), Robert Kocharian, served as both prime minister (1997-1998) and then the president of Armenia (1998-2008).
Current status of the dispute
So, what does all this have to do with Eurovision? Well, as we all know, the best way to handle a centuries long dispute is through passive-aggressive sniping at a singing competition.
In 2006, the Armenian singer listed his birthplace as Nagorno-Karabakh, a statement which was later removed from the official Eurovision website due to complaints by the Azerbaijan government. In 2009, the introduction to Armenia's entry included a picture of Nagorno-Karabakh. Again, the Azerbaijan government complained. In retaliation, the Armenian representative who relayed Armenia's results, 2008 competitor Sirusho, read the scores from a clipboard featuring an image from Nagorno-Karabakh while presenting in front of the same image (video below). In addition, Azerbaijan's postcard featured disputed territories in Iran, which Armenia stated created a double standard, as its own postcard did not include the disputed territory.
Additionally, the EBU fined the Azerbaijan affiliate for blurring the number of the voting line for Armenia as well as for disrupting the signal during the Armenian song, with a threat that Azerbaijan could be banned from the competition if such activities continued. Azerbaijan, however, claimed that the breaches of procedure were due to technical difficulties.
We're still not done with 2009, by the way. In August, 2009, the EBU began investigating complaints that Azerbaijani citizens who had voted for the Armenian entry had been detained and questioned by Azerbaijani security personnel for being a security threat, a claim which Azerbaijan denied. Although the EBU did not sanction Azerbaijan, it did note that such questioning was "unacceptable" and it strengthened its privacy rules to protect voter identities.
In the lead up to the 2012 content in Baku, the capitol of Azerbaijan, 22 Armenian singers, including former Eurovision contestants, demanded a boycott of the contest after an Armenian soldier was reportedly killed by an Azerbaijani sniper (it was later confirmed that the dead was the result of friendly fire), claiming "We reuse to appear in a country that is well known for mass killings and massacres of Armenians, in a country where anti-Armenian sentiments have been elevated to the level of state policy."
In decided to finally pull the Armenian entry (although it had already been confirmed as participating), the Armenian EBU affiliate stated, "Despite the fact that the Azerbaijani authorities have given security guarantees to all participating countries, several days ago the Azerbaijani president made a statement that enemy number one for Azerbaijan was Armenians. . .There is no logic to sending a participant to a country where he will be met as an enemy." A member of the Azerbaijan government shot back, stating "The Armenian refusal to take part in such a respected contest will cause even further damage to the already damaged image of Armenia."
The EBU, diplomatic as always, released the following statement: "We are truly disappointed by the broadcaster's decision to withdraw from this year's Eurovision Song Contest. Despite the efforts of the EBU and the Host Broadcaster to ensure a smooth participation for the Armenian delegation in this year's Contest, circumstances beyond our control lead to this unfortunate decision."
